Efforts and barriers shifting a city region towards circular transition – Lessons from a living lab from Pécs, Hungary

dc.author.affiliationDTOhu
dc.author.affiliationNONRKIhu
dc.author.mtmtid10015532
dc.author.mtmtid10073766
dc.author.mtmtid10001038
dc.author.mtmtid10015565
dc.author.mtmtid10025766
dc.contributor.authorVarjú, Viktor
dc.contributor.authorÓvári, Ágnes
dc.contributor.authorMezei, Cecília
dc.contributor.authorSuvák, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorVér, Csaba
dc.coverage.mtmtmtmthu
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-04T08:30:23Z
dc.date.available2022-10-04T08:30:23Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractA Circular Economy is usually seen as achieving ‘zero waste’ and closing the material flow loops. However, multiple governance, economic, legal, socio-spatial, cultural, and behavioural barriers may easily hamper the transition. This study summarises the lessons learned from the waste flow analysis and living lab (LL) of a case study from the H2020 REPAiR project. It shows how the results of a waste flow analysis created for an urban area can help decision-makers to co-create new place-based eco-innovative solutions and hence shift the city towards circularity. At the same time, during the living lab process, it became clear that the decision support method alone is not enough to co-create or co-design new innovations, in addition the regulatory environment and the peculiarities of governance may also present multiple obstacles. The centralised governance in Hungary and the centralisation tendency in waste management and secondary resource use hamper efficient local resource management. The work in the LL showed that a centralised governance structure hinders not only the co-creation of new solutions but also the transfer of good practices from other peri-urban areas. This is important because a society that is generally less innovative and less developed at the beginning of sustainability transition is innovating for the first time via the transfer of eco-innovative solutions. Our paper shows that the governance structure of a given spatial unit (i.e. a city region) may be a significant factor in the successful or unsuccessful adoption of good practices and for the circular transition, as may system adaptability, the level of local technological development, the level of integration of actors, strategies, interests, and policy interventions.hu
dc.description.accessszabadon elérhető / Open accesshu
dc.format.extentfirstpage1hu
dc.format.extentlastpage12hu
dc.format.extentvolume8hu
dc.identifier.citationFuture Cities and Environment 8:(1) p. 1-12. (2022)hu
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5334/fce.157hu
dc.identifier.issn2363-9075hu
dc.identifier.mtmt-recordid33092115
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11155/2687
dc.languageangolhu
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFuture Cities and Environmenthu
dc.relation.ispartofjournalissue1hu
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0) Nevezd meg!-Ne add el!-Ne változtasd!hu
dc.subjectkörkörös gazdasághu
dc.subjecthulladékkezeléshu
dc.subjecthulladékfeldolgozáshu
dc.subjecthulladékhasznosításhu
dc.subjectkormányzáshu
dc.titleEfforts and barriers shifting a city region towards circular transition – Lessons from a living lab from Pécs, Hungaryen
dc.typejournalArticlehu
dc.type.descriptionfolyóiratcikkhu
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
varju-efforts-2022.pdf
Size:
2.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
publikált változat / peer reviewed version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: